Why Not All Data Is Created Equal, And Some of It Is Already Expired

Not me sounding like the start of a memorial service, but…

Some of the data we’re still using to make compensation decisions in 2026?

She expired months ago…possibly last year. She is no longer with us. 🪦🥀

My point in saying this is that not all data is created equal.

We are moving waaay too fast as a market to pretend that a once-a-year snapshot still tells the full story!

AI is changing how labor and roles are valued in real time, y’all.

Not in theory. In practice.

Think about roles like “AI prompt engineer.” Twelve months ago, they were being priced as brand-new, premium roles with wildly inflated ranges because no one knew where they fit. 

Six months later, those same skills started folding into existing roles like product, marketing, and analytics.

Same work. Different valuation. Happening fast.

And yet, we’re still sitting in rooms saying things like, “Well, according to the survey…”

The survey from when, though?”

Because what you saw in January is absolutely not what’s true in June. 

And what’s true in June might be irrelevant by December. That’s just the reality now.

I’ve been in too many compensation cycles where everyone turns to HR like we’re supposed to magically conjure certainty out of half-fresh numbers and good intentions, but compensation isn’t just numbers on a sheet.

There’s a deeply psychological aspect too. It’s how people decide whether they’re respected, whether they trust leadership, whether they’re staying, or whether they’re quietly job-searching while sheltering- in-job.

Asking if you have the data used to be the question. Now, you should be asking if you have data that you can defend.

And how do you make a compensation strategy more iterative in a market that refuses to slow down for our annual cycles?

That’s our topic for today, class!

Everyone is Looking at You Now

If you’ve ever led a compensation conversation, this probably sounds familiar:

You present the range, someone from finance tilts their head, then the CEO ends up asking something along the lines of “How confident are we in this?”

And suddenly, it feels like a courtroom drama, and you are the only one without a lawyer! 😬

Quite frankly, this is where bad data shows its ass.

HR and comp leaders are expected to show up as strategic finance partners, but we’re often handed tools that don’t operate at finance speed. Make it make sense.

We’re supposed to bring authority and clarity while relying on surveys that update once a year and don’t account for how aggressively the market can shift in six months!

That gap is exactly why so many HR leaders struggle to secure real autonomy. 

If you can’t confidently explain why a role is priced the way it is, you lose credibility. Once credibility is gone, good luck getting buy-in unless you found a four-leaf clover that day!

This gets even messier when you’re pricing roles that didn’t exist before. Instead of benchmarking, you end up forecasting.

Unfortunately, you can’t do that with stale data!

This is where Payscale’s ✨contextual data✨ shines. It helps you understand how roles are evolving, what skills are driving value, and how to price work that’s still in the process of taking shape.

Now, you can walk into a room fully prepared and confident!

Is Your Comp Cycle Keeping up With the Times?

To me, annual compensation data feels like bringing a flip phone to a group chat.

Technically functional? Sure, I guess. Practically useless? Sadly yeah, because the job market is simply moving too fast. 

Labor value is shifting as frequently as the stock market, and skills are being repriced in real time! Kinda crazy to think about TBH. 

AI alone is changing how entire job families are evaluated, yet, many orgs are still treating compensation like a set it and forget it exercise.

That’s how you end up with confused employees and stressed HR teams.

People aren’t leaving jobs at the same rate right now, but believe me, they’re paying attention! 

They’re watching postings, comparing notes, screenshotting ranges, and what they see on LinkedIn in March will absolutely influence how they feel about their pay in November.

So when your data lags, your narrative falls apart!

This is exactly why compensation can’t be a moment-in-time decision anymore. 

It has to be iterative—at least quarterly at a minimum, so you can be constantly informed by what’s happening in the market.

Thankfully, Payscale’s data ecosystem is built for this pace. 

Their HR-sourced, survey-grade validated data spans over 4,200 organizations and 9 million incumbents, and it’s continuously refreshed and AI-enhanced to expand relevance as roles evolve.

Basically, that just means you’re not making random adjustments every three months and calling it agile.

Now, you can make informed decisions with data that’s designed to keep up!

Why Compensation Philosophy Needs Proof

We’ve ALL heard the tired phrase “HR is not your friend.” 😤

Being in this role is also understanding that, historically, we’re not the most trusted function at every org.

So much so that Gen Z doesn’t even come to us first with pay questions!

Wanna take a quick guess where they’ve been checking first?

They’ve been asking AI all their pay questions. 😨

*Cue record scratch*

So AI is scraping outdated postings, questionable sources, or just plain wildly optimistic assumptions, and then they’re walking into conversations armed with confidence and screenshots.

“I saw a job on LinkedIn that pays XYZ. Why doesn’t mine?”

That question isn’t going away. It’s not even an unreasonable question either, which is why you need to be prepared for when these conversations do happen!

This is exactly where compensation philosophy matters, but philosophy without data may as well just be a TED Talk.

To combat misinformation, HR needs real-time, defensible data and the ability to explain it clearly at both the executive and employee level.

You have to be able to say: here’s how we price roles, here’s how skills factor in, here’s what the market is doing right now, and here’s why your role sits where it does.

Payscale makes that possible because every data point is traceable and explainable, so instead of just saying “trust me bro,” you’re showing your work.

And that’s how actual trust gets rebuilt! 

Sorry, But Your Data Spoils Way Faster Now 

At this point, the pattern should be pretty clear: data doesn’t age gracefully anymore.

The days where you could run a compensation cycle once a year, lock the spreadsheet, and feel good about it for the next 11 months are gone.

That worked when roles were stable and AI wasn’t actively rewriting job expectations while you slept.

Now, data may as well have the same lifespan as a bowl of fruit!

When it’s fresh, it’s great. 

Then, it starts to soften. 

Then, after you’ve ignored it for too long, it smells weird and suddenly everyone’s asking why it’s still in the fridge.

That’s what outdated compensation data does inside an org. 

It oh-so-quietly creates confusion and mistrust, turning normal pay conversations into emotional standoffs between HR, managers, finance, and employees who feel like something isn’t adding up.

And the worst part is that HR ALWAYS ends up stuck in the middle, re-justifying decisions over and over because everyone thinks the problem is communication, when it’s actually stale inputs.

The moral of the story here is that bad data is a foundation for chaos. 

It creates unnecessary stress, slows decision-making, and makes every comp conversation feel higher stakes than it needs to be. 

Meanwhile, good data does the opposite by shortening debates and allowing you to move faster without feeling reckless!

This is why compensation strategy has to be iterative now, so it can be grounded in what’s actually happening in the market right now.

Data That Holds up Under Pressure

Payscale matters in this moment because they know the difference between giving you more data and giving you highly defensible data.

What you need is the kind of data that holds up in exec rooms, manager conversations, and employee questions without falling apart under pressure!

Their approach goes beyond traditional surveys by combining trusted, HR-sourced data with AI-enhanced modeling and demand insights, so your decisions don’t live in isolation or die in spreadsheets. 

The data is continuously refreshed, which means you’re not guessing or overcorrecting every few months just to feel like you’re keeping up.

That’s why so many companies rely on Payscale to turn pay from a constant source of tension into an actual advantage!

If you’ve ever sat in a comp meeting with all eyes on you, you already know that true confidence can only come from preparation. 

That means you should be able to say, “Here’s what the data shows, here’s why it matters, and here’s how we move forward.”

Payscale is the data engine for fair, confident pay. 

And in a market moving this fast, that’s hardly optional anymore.

Get data you can defend

Hebba Youssef
Hebba Youssef
In collaboration with:

Pay philosophy without proof is just vibes.

Employees want to see the math.

JOIN 150K+ HR LEADERS

Get insights, learnings, and advice on how to build companies and cultures that people actually love.

This field is hidden when viewing the form
This field is hidden when viewing the form
This field is hidden when viewing the form
This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

No spam. Unsubscribe any time.